Ebola+Virus+Data+and+Results

Results The first phylogenetic analysis was the 23 genomes comparing Reston Virus and Ebola Virus with the population of interest. This included generating three phylogenetic trees to include a more complete analysis of the comparison. On the previous page the alignment is shown, below are the results of the genomes and the corresponding phylogenetic trees.After aligning the complete genomes, phylogenetic tree were generated using three methods, Maximum Likelihood, Neighbor Joining and Minimum Evolution. All trees were completed with Boot Strap Analysis in the parameters. The complete parameters for the phylogenetic trees are shown under methods.

Maximum Likelihood Trees for Nucleoprotein and whole genome sequences reveal the strongest evidence in support of Folarin et al. These two trees are shown in Figures 7 and 8.



The remaining results are posted at the bottom of this page for further review. For convenience, the page template is displayed below.

PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE

Introduction Primary Research Methods Discussion References

All remaining phylogenetic trees for whole viral genome and proteins of interest.



The next genomic analysis was the Viral Protein 24. The importance of this protein is discussed in the primary research section. Below are the results of the protein alignment and the corresponding phylogenetic trees.



The next genomic analysis was the Viral Protein 30. The results of the calculated phylogenetic trees are shown below.

The next genomic analysis was the Viral Protein 40. The results of the calculated phylogenetic trees are shown below.

The next genomic analysis was the Glycoprotein. The results of the calculated phylogenetic trees are shown below.

The next genomic analysis was the Nucleoprotein. The results of the calculated phylogenetic trees are shown below.

PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE

Introduction Primary Research Methods Discussion References